“Git Rebase vs scal” Kod odpowiedzi

Github Scal vs Rebase

V1: "Hello"
V2: "Hello world" // This update adds 'world'
V3 (A V1 Copy) - Merge: "Hello World, Im Idan!" // Merge V2 that between...
V3 (A V1 Copy) - Rebase: "Hello, Im Idan!" // Skip V2 that between...
The Biton

Git Rebase vs scal

Git rebase and merge both integrate changes from one branch into another. Where they differ is how it's done. Git rebase moves a feature branch into a master. Git merge adds a new commit, preserving the history
Busy Batfish

Git Rebase vs scal

If you want to see the history completely same as it happened, you should use merge. Merge preserves history whereas rebase rewrites it.
Rebasing is better to streamline a complex history, you are able to change the commit history by interactive rebase. 
You can remove undesired commits, squash two or more commits into one or edit the commit message.
Rebase will present conflicts one commit at a time whereas merge will present them all at once.
It is better and much easier to handle the conflicts but you shouldn’t forget that
reverting a rebase is much more difficult than reverting a merge if there are many conflicts. 
You can find details of a basic rebase process from git — Basic Rebase .
Mighty Unicorn

Odpowiedzi podobne do “Git Rebase vs scal”

Pytania podobne do “Git Rebase vs scal”

Więcej pokrewnych odpowiedzi na “Git Rebase vs scal” w Shell/Bash

Przeglądaj popularne odpowiedzi na kod według języka

Przeglądaj inne języki kodu